BookOpen Access
The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma
Susan Hyde · 2017
Catalogue summary
Cross-national observation data since 1960 and six country cases, including Armenia, explain why authoritarian-leaning rulers invite monitors who may expose election manipulation.
Why this matters
The Armenian case contributes to a general theory about international democratic norms and whether monitoring deters fraud or legitimizes electoral autocracy.
Citation
Susan Hyde 2017. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460777
Related in the repository
Articulating Power Through the Parochial: The 1956 Armenian Church Election in Lebanon
2017 · Journal Article
Beyond Statist Paradigms: Sociospatial Positionality and Diaspora Mobilization in International Relations
2017 · Journal Article
De facto states and their socio-economic structures in the post-Soviet space after the annexation of Crimea
2017 · Journal Article
Diaspora in the System of International Relations in the Modern Word (On the Example of the Armenian Diaspora)
2017 · Journal Article
Publication details and source links are provided for discovery. Consult the linked publisher or repository record as the source of authority.