Journal ArticlePaywalled

Why do conflict-generated diasporas pursue sovereignty-based claims through state-based or transnational channels? Armenian, Albanian and Palestinian diasporas in the UK compared

Maria Koinova · 2014

Catalogue summary

Comparing Albanian, Armenian, and Palestinian communities in the United Kingdom, this article examines how diaspora actors pursue sovereignty claims through host-state and transnational channels. Its Armenian case addresses ties to Nagorno-Karabakh.

Why this matters

It offers a comparative way to study Armenian diaspora mobilization around Artsakh while preserving the need for politically sensitive review.

Read the publication ↗

Published in

European Journal of International Relations

Year

2014

Language

English

DOI

10.1177/1354066113509115

Citation

Maria Koinova 2014. Why do conflict-generated diasporas pursue sovereignty-based claims through state-based or transnational channels? Armenian, Albanian and Palestinian diasporas in the UK compared. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113509115

Topics

Diaspora Artsakh Politics, law, diplomacy, and human rights

Related in the repository

The humanitarian road to Nagorno-Karabakh: media, morality and infrastructural promise in the Armenian diaspora

2017 · Journal Article

Diasporas and secessionist conflicts: the mobilization of the Armenian, Albanian and Chechen diasporas

2010 · Journal Article

Forced ethnic migrants' integration : Syrian Armenians in Armenia and Lebanon (2011-2016)

2018 · Dissertation

Contesting National Identities in an Ethnically Homogeneous State: The Case of Armenian Democratization

2009 · Dissertation

Publication details and source links are provided for discovery. Consult the linked publisher or repository record as the source of authority.