Denying the Armenian genocide: Patterns of thinking as defence‐mechanisms
Israel W. Charny and Daphna Fromer · 1998
Catalogue summary
This analysis studies argumentative strategies used to dispute evidence of the Armenian Genocide in an American political appeal. It identifies recurring rhetorical patterns that recast denial as reasoned inquiry while obscuring responsibility and historical documentation.
Why this matters
The article offers a practical lens for evaluating how persuasive techniques can distort historical evidence in public disputes over Armenian mass violence.
Citation
Israel W. Charny and Daphna Fromer 1998. Denying the Armenian genocide: Patterns of thinking as defence‐mechanisms. Patterns of Prejudice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322x.1998.9970246
Related in the repository
Publication details and source links are provided for discovery. Consult the linked publisher or repository record as the source of authority.