The relevance of remedial secession in the post-Soviet “frozen conflicts”
Lina Laurinavičiūtė and Laurynas Biekša · 2015
Catalogue summary
Laurinavičiūtė and Biekša set out legal conditions associated with remedial secession and compare them across several post-Soviet conflicts, including Nagorno-Karabakh. The article argues that the doctrine does not justify the independence claims considered and stresses the role of good-faith negotiation.
Why this matters
It supplies a clearly attributed legal framework for reading competing claims about Artsakh, while preserving the article’s limits and disputed political context.
Citation
Lina Laurinavičiūtė and Laurynas Biekša 2015. The relevance of remedial secession in the post-Soviet “frozen conflicts”. International Comparative Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.008
Related in the repository
Publication details and source links are provided for discovery. Consult the linked publisher or repository record as the source of authority.