The article critically examines Armenian debates over Artsakh’s pre-2020 territorial boundaries and the Madrid Principles, focusing on legitimacy, territoriality, security, and proposed concessions.
The author reflects on empire through contradictory Turkish and Armenian historical narratives, asking how imperial structures are defined, why subject peoples remember them differently, and what empires mean for present international politics.
Using Armenian-American organizations as its case, the study maps lobbying institutions, agendas, goals, and mechanisms through which ethnic interest groups seek to shape United States foreign policy.
The paper evaluates how the 2020 war altered the regional balance around Artsakh, with particular attention to Russian peacekeeping, Turkish influence, and Moscow’s longer-term strategic position.
Assessing national, regional, and international corridors, the paper weighs Turkey’s geography, ambitions, leadership, and external actors, then argues that east-west connectivity could place Armenia on broader transport routes as a secondary hub.
A complete review of relevant Turkish parliamentary speeches maps party positions on international Armenian Genocide recognition, finding widespread denial alongside marginal exceptions and variations shaped by ideology, historical setting, local memory, and individual background.
The article interprets Washington’s changing South Caucasus agenda across the 2020 fighting and its aftermath, relating American choices to Russia, Iran, energy projects, and Ukraine.
Comparing Libya, Syria, and the 2020 Artsakh war, this security study argues that drones remain dependent on reconnaissance, air defense, electronic warfare, and combined capabilities.
A proposed Artsakh resilience framework combines literature, municipal documents, expert interviews, reports, and ArcGIS analysis to identify infrastructure weakness, education needs, asset redundancy, hazard mapping, mitigation, and long-term planning priorities.
The comparison of Georgia’s 2003 and Armenia’s 2018 protests tracks what happened to civil-society leaders after authoritarian governments fell and reform-oriented administrations took power.
Fieldwork with Yezidi and Armenian herders examines livestock mobility in post-Soviet Armenia amid earthquake recovery, closed borders, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and changing regional meat markets. The authors distinguish village-scale collective herding from longer-range seasonal movement and interpret both as adaptations linking livelihood, territorial presence, and globalization.
The article applies critical discourse analysis to Armenian digital communication during the 2020 Karabakh war, examining frames, recurring myths, ideological assumptions, and social-platform roles.
Drawing on a 2015 European Parliament debate, the article studies how legislators used emotion and shared norms to justify recognition of the Armenian Genocide in EU diplomacy.
This Indonesian-language legal case study discusses civilian, military, and environmental harms attributed to both sides in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and considers international accountability.
Two studies of Armenians in Armenia and the United States model how national glorification and resentment reduce forgiveness, while diaspora identification can support more constructive intergroup attitudes.
The article interprets Pakistan–Azerbaijan relations through comparisons between the Karabakh and Kashmir disputes, emphasizing autonomy, territorial claims, and diplomatic alignment.
Using Turkey's denial of the Armenian genocide, the paper links testimonial injustice with hermeneutical oppression: survivors and descendants are cast as vicious rememberers while the meaning of genocide itself is distorted through collective misremembrance.
After war began in Artsakh/Karabagh on 27 September 2020, scholars in Caucasian, Ottoman, Armenian, Turkish, and broader Middle Eastern fields reconsidered research legitimacy, goals, practice, and ethics amid forty-four days of violence.
The article defines Armenian diaspora socio-economic potential through skills, entrepreneurship, capital, demographic structure, cohesion, and social networks, then proposes surveys and interviews in Moscow, Krasnoyarsk, and Stavropol to assess EAEU integration.
Using the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a case study, the paper evaluates how intensive drone use affected military perceptions and future expectations for localized warfare.
Assessing 2005–2013 Iran-Azerbaijan relations, the article connects Baku's Israeli military cooperation to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Iranian security concerns, Armenia-Iran ties, and later Israeli drone movement during the Second Artsakh War.
Election-observation records since 1960 and cases including Armenia explain why pseudo-democratic governments invite monitors even when manipulation may be exposed.
The study attributes Azerbaijan's increased effectiveness in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War to Turkish political, diplomatic, and military support, focusing on supplied unmanned aerial vehicles and their asserted game-changing battlefield role.
The essay tests Casanova’s world-republic framework against Georgian, Kurdish, and Armenian vernacularization in Persianate cosmopolitan settings and the making of national epics.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record