Victoria Street in Nicosia’s Arabahmet neighbourhood is reconstructed through Byzantine, Lusignan, Ottoman, British, and Republic-era changes, including the Armenian Church and later neglect.
Using Lebanon's power-sharing and party politics as context, the chapter follows Armenian church bodies from the French Mandate through regional crises, showing their competing national agendas and cultural role.
The article follows ex-Ottoman Armenian refugees in Soviet Armenia as they attach memory to Ergir across nostalgia, Stalin-era suppression, and a later revival of homeland thinking.
An ethnography of Armenianness in contemporary Turkey compares Christian Armenians, Muslim or Alevi citizens reclaiming ancestry, and migrants from the Republic of Armenia.
National health surveys from 46 countries compare psychological, physical, and sexual intimate-partner violence among women aged 15–49; reported prevalence falls below five percent in Armenia and Comoros.
A survey of recent Armenian medical graduates finds gaps in clinical, research, and leadership skills alongside strong interest in further training and diaspora engagement.
The article offers a conflict-resolution argument about the breakdown of the OSCE-led Armenia–Azerbaijan process and interprets the political conditions surrounding the 2020 war and ceasefire.
Combining archives, cultural texts, interviews, and participant observation, the dissertation follows Armenian displacement from early-modern trans-imperial networks through racial classification, orphan imagery, Soviet emancipation, and post-Soviet development work.
Parliamentary debates from the deposition of Abdülhamid II through the post-caliphate decade show how the late Ottoman and early Turkish Republic redefined dynastic property as public ownership. The legal history connects Yıldız Palace to later wartime and genocide-era appropriation.
Two Stepanakert memorial museums combine exhibition and funeral practices to historicize recent armed conflict, preserve creators’ direct memory, and consolidate hostility toward Azerbaijan within Artsakh’s political landscape.
Tracing GUAM from its 1997 founding, the article shows how a development-oriented alliance became preoccupied with security as Russian power returned. Nagorno-Karabakh and Transnistria, the 2008 war in Georgia, and Crimea’s annexation form a comparative sequence of unresolved conflict around the Black Sea.
The Msho Arakelots relief is read for a mace, cross-guarded sword, trumpet, shield, stirrups, and scabbard chape, then compared with Byzantine, Muslim, and Armenian evidence.
An indexed Guerguerian document group combines genocide bibliographies, Dashnak congress notes, a 1914 Izmit deportation telegram, Hairenik references, and the compiler’s annotations on his own book.
Guerguerian’s mixed file joins Armenian memoirs, source lists, a 1919 Cemal Shahabettin letter, Russian-policy notes, a Boğazlıyan court ruling, and a report on the Adana Massacre.
The Historia Imperii Mediterranei series published Armenian booklets in Italy before the Second World War, combining art, architecture, literature, and politics with the Armenian Committee’s advocacy. Its treatment of Strzygowski and Frasson also exposes fascist cultural strategy and racial theory.
The article reconstructs early-modern Polish discourses about Armenians through debates over mercantilism, luxury consumption, social order, and the perceived Ottoman threat.
Mostafa and Mahmood review the Eurasian Economic Union's development, performance, and prospects, treating Armenia as one of its five member states. They argue that Russian dominance, economic weakness, political goals, and distrust among members have limited the union's integration agenda.
Roberts and Ziemer use elite and expert interviews to test whether Armenia's growing dependence on Russia produced convergence with Russian authoritarian practices after 2013. They find evidence of influence but argue that incentives and legitimacy costs limited direct adoption of restrictive policy.
Fieldwork in Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Lebanon compares the integration of Armenians displaced from Syria between 2011 and 2016. The thesis weighs economic conditions, cultural difference, nostalgia, state policy, and NGO support, concluding that livelihood security most strongly shapes settlement outcomes.
The study reconstructs the political and popular making of April 24 remembrance, from the 1965 Yerevan mobilization through official Soviet observance, diaspora ceremonies, memorial construction, and changing national demands.
The chapter critiques the European human-rights court's reliance on absent general consensus when reviewing Switzerland's punishment of Doğu Perinçek for genocide denial.
A legal note follows the Armenian Catholicosate's attempt to recover Sis through Turkish courts and the ECHR, comparing property doctrine with an Article 9 religious-freedom claim.
The dissertation traces migration from the Ottoman homeland to the United States and then examines diaspora organizations’ efforts to shape American policy on genocide recognition, aid, and relations with Armenia. Its argument treats lobbying as the mechanism that moved contested historical claims into foreign-policy debate.
The article studies Ottoman official language about the anti-Armenian violence of 1895–1897, emphasizing passive constructions, euphemism, and claims of provocation.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record