Armenians in 20th century. The outline of the most important problems
Grzegorz PełczyńskiThis Polish overview follows Armenians (Ormian) through Ludobójstwo in Turcji, Soviet experience in the ZSRR, diaspora communities, and restored independence.
This Polish overview follows Armenians (Ormian) through Ludobójstwo in Turcji, Soviet experience in the ZSRR, diaspora communities, and restored independence.
Drawing on community histories, Armenian-language periodicals, and interviews in Lebanon, France, and the United States, the dissertation traces how post-genocide dispersion became a transnational diaspora divided between competing homeland-centered and diaspora-centered institutions.
The study records more than twenty Latin- and Armenian-rite Catholic churches and chapels built or restored in Georgia, chiefly between 1860 and 1910.
This Turkish-language overview places the late-Ottoman Armenian issue after Balkan Christian national movements and considers diaspora advocacy, parliamentary recognition, and the possibility of future scholarly reconciliation.
A master's multimedia project organizes Los Angeles Armenian-American history, current community organizations, identity maintenance, and intergenerational prospects into four website sections.
Turkish denial, collaborative repression, emerging voices for recognition, and diaspora identity frame this study of the Armenian Genocide’s political consequences nearly a century later.
Survey evidence from elected officials and Armenian organization leaders in Glendale compares perceived leadership styles with acculturation, community commitment, and cultural identity.
Tölölyan and Papazian discuss divergent ideas of nationhood in Armenia and diaspora communities and consider how those differences shape institutions, mobilization, and collective identity.
Özgül examines Turkish court petitions by Muslim citizens of Armenian descent seeking changes to registered names and religions, revealing tensions between conversion, tolerance, and legal identity.
A linguistic survey of Syria identifies Armenian as one of four Christian non-Arab languages in 2011, together with Western Aramaic, Suret, and Turoyo.
Գիրքը համեմատում է Հայաստանից դուրս գործող հայագիտական կենտրոնների ներկա վիճակը Ամերիկայում, Եվրոպայում, Մերձավոր Արևելքում և հետխորհրդային երկրներում՝ ներկայացնելով հիմնադրման պայմանները, համայնքային դերը, գործունեության ուղղություններն ու արդի խնդիրների լուծումները։
Coverage in Lebanese Armenian newspapers of the 1946 repatriation campaign reveals changing ideas of citizenship, homeland, and belonging as the newly independent country defined itself.
Abramson profiles Lebanese Armenians as both a self-organized diasporic community and a constituent of Lebanese society, emphasizing the institutions built after refugee settlement.
The biography reconstructs Polish-Armenian scholar Stefan Wartanowic Lehacy's education, translations, church service, family background, and possible painting activity during the seventeenth century.
A fragmented essay joins inherited family memories, survivor exile, Australian Gallipoli commemoration, and disputed naming to portray genocide denial as an embodied intergenerational presence.
The 2007 and 2010 congressional Genocide resolutions are used to show Armenian-American and Turkish lobbying competing over United States foreign policy and bilateral relations.
Armenians in twentieth-century Ethiopia recast their host country as a homeland, emphasizing settlement and royal friendship over exile, lost fatherland, or genocide in the collective memory of immigrants and descendants.
Letters, jokes, and anecdotes from the Western Armenian Diaspora construct changing images of Soviet and post-Soviet Russia, combining admiration and criticism with expectations surrounding Armenian Genocide recognition.
Y-chromosome evidence from 82 Hamsheni men was compared across three proposed homelands, favoring central historical Armenia and finding no support for a Central Asian origin.
Examining English-language work by third-generation Armenian American authors, the article connects literary searches for ancestry with survivor narratives, inherited identity, and continuing genocide denial.
Four Turkish American–Armenian American dialogue groups test grassroots diplomacy as an alternative to transferring reconciliation upward through governments, while exposing tensions between conflict settlement, social justice, and human rights.
L'article relie la diaspora arménienne au génocide de 1915, à la mobilisation contre le négationnisme depuis les années 1960, au lobbying international et à son influence politique après l'indépendance de l'Arménie en 1991.
A study of Armenian diaspora print culture examines literary criticism in France, Egypt, and the United States from 1919 to 1928 after the genocide. Western Armenian newspapers carried a debate between cultural preservation and literary innovation, making literature both an aesthetic practice and a social institution.
Survey data, electoral platforms, newspapers, laws, and elite interviews reveal competing Armenian identities around genocide memory, Turkey, Karabagh, diaspora citizenship, justice, and democracy.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record