Drawing on archives and field investigation, the author documents Ghazanchetsots Church's foundation, plan, spatial design, and decoration, then analyzes ownership reassignment and vandalism attributed to Azerbaijani authorities.
Using local historical variation, the study investigates whether Armenian and Greek skills continued to influence economic development in Turkey after both communities were forcibly removed.
Using interviews and policy sources, this article applies constructivist theory to Indonesia’s response to the 2020 Artsakh conflict while it served on the UN Security Council.
Western Armenian women's writing from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is read through philosophical anthropology, feminism, literature, and social transformation to examine subjectivity, male-female identity, emancipation, and rights under Ottoman patriarchy.
Photo studios from the 1880s–1930s, satirical cartoons from 1920–1958, and costume exhibitions in 1972–1976 reveal how Armenian women and their organizations negotiated visibility within Qajar and Pahlavi modernization.
Framing the 2020 Artsakh war as information and psychological warfare, the author links military messaging, territorial claims, human rights, and alleged crimes, then calls for the Armenian side to present documented claims internationally.
Comparing the 1991-1994 and 2020 Karabakh wars, the author shifts explanation from weapons alone toward political transitions, diplomatic policies, military forecasting, and other strategic differences between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
The article connects challenges facing Armenia and Artsakh after the 2020 war to earlier Musavatist, Young Turk, and Kemalist versions of pan-Turkish Great Azerbaijan, treating historical prehistory as a guide to present implications.
The article critically examines Armenian debates over Artsakh’s pre-2020 territorial boundaries and the Madrid Principles, focusing on legitimacy, territoriality, security, and proposed concessions.
The author reflects on empire through contradictory Turkish and Armenian historical narratives, asking how imperial structures are defined, why subject peoples remember them differently, and what empires mean for present international politics.
Using Armenian-American organizations as its case, the study maps lobbying institutions, agendas, goals, and mechanisms through which ethnic interest groups seek to shape United States foreign policy.
The paper evaluates how the 2020 war altered the regional balance around Artsakh, with particular attention to Russian peacekeeping, Turkish influence, and Moscow’s longer-term strategic position.
Archival evidence traces American proposals for Transcaucasian borders in 1919–1920, from a possible Armenia mandate to interstate disengagement and an unsuccessful governor-general arrangement in disputed territory.
Assessing national, regional, and international corridors, the paper weighs Turkey’s geography, ambitions, leadership, and external actors, then argues that east-west connectivity could place Armenia on broader transport routes as a secondary hub.
A complete review of relevant Turkish parliamentary speeches maps party positions on international Armenian Genocide recognition, finding widespread denial alongside marginal exceptions and variations shaped by ideology, historical setting, local memory, and individual background.
The article interprets Washington’s changing South Caucasus agenda across the 2020 fighting and its aftermath, relating American choices to Russia, Iran, energy projects, and Ukraine.
Comparing Libya, Syria, and the 2020 Artsakh war, this security study argues that drones remain dependent on reconnaissance, air defense, electronic warfare, and combined capabilities.
The Turkish-language analysis treats the 2020 Karabakh war as an interstate military case, focusing on operational geography, supply routes, defensive choices, firepower, and unmanned systems.
A proposed Artsakh resilience framework combines literature, municipal documents, expert interviews, reports, and ArcGIS analysis to identify infrastructure weakness, education needs, asset redundancy, hazard mapping, mitigation, and long-term planning priorities.
The comparison of Georgia’s 2003 and Armenia’s 2018 protests tracks what happened to civil-society leaders after authoritarian governments fell and reform-oriented administrations took power.
Fieldwork with Yezidi and Armenian herders examines livestock mobility in post-Soviet Armenia amid earthquake recovery, closed borders, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and changing regional meat markets. The authors distinguish village-scale collective herding from longer-range seasonal movement and interpret both as adaptations linking livelihood, territorial presence, and globalization.
The article applies critical discourse analysis to Armenian digital communication during the 2020 Karabakh war, examining frames, recurring myths, ideological assumptions, and social-platform roles.
Stories about Artašēs and P‘arnavaz are read as evidence of Hellenistic marriage alliances connecting Armenia and K‘art‘li with North-Caucasian polities beyond the better-known record of Alan warfare.
A theoretical securitization account compares Artsakh with Northern Ireland, placing religious identity in societal security and distinguishing the former's nationalism and overlapping territorial claims from the latter's hierarchical ethnic conflict.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record