Examining English-language work by third-generation Armenian American authors, the article connects literary searches for ancestry with survivor narratives, inherited identity, and continuing genocide denial.
Four Turkish American–Armenian American dialogue groups test grassroots diplomacy as an alternative to transferring reconciliation upward through governments, while exposing tensions between conflict settlement, social justice, and human rights.
Interviews with administrators at five major Armenian research libraries assess missions, services, collections, instruction, access, staffing, facilities, budgets, and outcomes against higher-education library standards two decades after independence.
Across seventeen centuries in Jerusalem, Armenian religious authorities and the wider community maintained a permanent presence through successive conquests, negotiated compromises, and shared responsibility with Greek and Latin churches for safeguarding Christian Holy Places.
Greek and Classical Armenian New Testament noun phrases are compared across contrastive, generic, proper-name, and pragmatic uses of the definite article.
The 1909 Adana massacres are placed within the Ottoman revolutionary process, moving beyond Turkish-Armenian historiographic binaries to emphasize a weak public sphere, economic anxieties, and violence against the Armenian population.
Dabaghyan studies postwar place renaming in Artsakh as a cultural practice shaped by imperial legacies, modernization, conflict, and local knowledge.
The lead article of REA vol. 32, presenting a newly discovered Armenian epitome preserving a distinctive variant of the Trojan War narrative and the founding of Rome, and what it shows about how classical legend was received and reshaped in Armenian literary tradition.
A regional security assessment relates South Caucasus conflicts to Armenia's reliance on Russia and Iran, Azerbaijan's Turkish ties, and competing United States and European interests.
Dixon compares periods when Turkish military and civilian officials actively defended the state's Armenian Genocide narrative, tracing continuity and change in their strategies.
A comparative study of Armenian, Albanian, and Chechen diaspora engagement examines how support for secessionist conflicts develops after local independence claims. It traces how diaspora institutions and local political centers can intensify or dissipate conflict coalitions.
A comparative law-and-religion approach connects nineteenth-century changes in Ottoman Christians' legal status to the Hamidian massacres and ultimately the 1915 Armenian Genocide, locating mass violence within failed reform and intercommunal state relations.
L'article relie la diaspora arménienne au génocide de 1915, à la mobilisation contre le négationnisme depuis les années 1960, au lobbying international et à son influence politique après l'indépendance de l'Arménie en 1991.
Baronian examines how scarce and unevenly circulated photographs of the Armenian Genocide can operate as supports for memory amid persistent public denial.
The paper introduces a Western Armenian pattern in which two negative morphemes within one clause may yield either independent semantic negations or a single negative-concord interpretation.
Comparing the Ottoman Empire before 1915 with Rwanda before 1994, the article follows how genocide risks develop and coalesce, then proposes a temporal model supplementing static accounts of preconditions.
Comparing Turkey's denial of the Armenian Genocide with Japan's response to Second World War crimes, this article tests theories of state ontological security. It argues that historical context and international pressures shape how states manage identity-threatening pasts.
Using roughly 350 borrowings from texts dated 1559 to 1669, the study maps Polish and Ukrainian lexical influence on the everyday Kipchak of Armenian communities.
Ulgen analyzes Atatürk's speeches and political writings to trace how portrayals of Armenians helped establish enduring narratives of Turkish innocence and Armenian culpability.
Azarian-Ceccato studies how Armenian Genocide narratives pass between generations, treating family testimony and later retelling as linked processes that sustain and reshape memory.
Watenpaugh uses League of Nations Rescue Home intake surveys from Aleppo to examine the rescue of Armenian women and children after the genocide. He places this work within the League's larger postwar humanitarian project and its political setting in the eastern Mediterranean.
The article examines official renaming of Armenian and other non-Muslim place names under Ottoman and republican rule, presenting a 1916 decree and interpreting toponym change as historical erasure.
Deringil situates mass conversions of Armenians during the Hamidian massacres within late Ottoman debates over nationalism, reform, and the Armenian Question. The article highlights the relative lack of Ottoman-archive research on conversions in the 1894–1897 violence.
The article traces missionary activity (misyonerlik faaliyetleri) among Anatolian Armenians (Ermeniler), the Patriarchate's opposition to converts, British-American pressure, and Ottoman recognition of a separate Protestant millet.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record