This Turkish legal article advances a specific argument concerning Armenian state responsibility for conduct associated with the first and second Karabakh wars.
Drawing on a 2015 European Parliament debate, the article studies how legislators used emotion and shared norms to justify recognition of the Armenian Genocide in EU diplomacy.
This forcefully argued article links the displacement of Artsakh Armenians and destruction of cultural heritage to longer histories of genocide, denial, and national narrative construction.
This Indonesian-language legal case study discusses civilian, military, and environmental harms attributed to both sides in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and considers international accountability.
Written during the 2020 war, the author's Karabakh reflection combines personal observations with Armenian and Azerbaijani literature, media accounts, historical relations, proposed solutions, and possible future outcomes.
Two studies of Armenians in Armenia and the United States model how national glorification and resentment reduce forgiveness, while diaspora identification can support more constructive intergroup attitudes.
The article interprets Pakistan–Azerbaijan relations through comparisons between the Karabakh and Kashmir disputes, emphasizing autonomy, territorial claims, and diplomatic alignment.
Tracing contact from the late second century BCE through the Rhandeia settlement of 63 CE, the author divides Arsacid policy toward Armenia into three phases shaped by Parthian efforts and rivalry with Rome.
Using Turkey's denial of the Armenian genocide, the paper links testimonial injustice with hermeneutical oppression: survivors and descendants are cast as vicious rememberers while the meaning of genocide itself is distorted through collective misremembrance.
After war began in Artsakh/Karabagh on 27 September 2020, scholars in Caucasian, Ottoman, Armenian, Turkish, and broader Middle Eastern fields reconsidered research legitimacy, goals, practice, and ethics amid forty-four days of violence.
The article defines Armenian diaspora socio-economic potential through skills, entrepreneurship, capital, demographic structure, cohesion, and social networks, then proposes surveys and interviews in Moscow, Krasnoyarsk, and Stavropol to assess EAEU integration.
The article attributes Nagorno-Karabakh negotiation deadlock to conflicting geopolitical goals and argues that Russian influence encourages conflict freezing to keep Armenia and Azerbaijan within Moscow's orbit.
Using the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a case study, the paper evaluates how intensive drone use affected military perceptions and future expectations for localized warfare.
Assessing 2005–2013 Iran-Azerbaijan relations, the article connects Baku's Israeli military cooperation to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Iranian security concerns, Armenia-Iran ties, and later Israeli drone movement during the Second Artsakh War.
The article narrates the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict from a Turkish security perspective, reviewing historical claims, external actors, the ceasefire, and its implications for South Caucasian power.
Election-observation records since 1960 and cases including Armenia explain why pseudo-democratic governments invite monitors even when manipulation may be exposed.
The study attributes Azerbaijan's increased effectiveness in the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War to Turkish political, diplomatic, and military support, focusing on supplied unmanned aerial vehicles and their asserted game-changing battlefield role.
The essay tests Casanova’s world-republic framework against Georgian, Kurdish, and Armenian vernacularization in Persianate cosmopolitan settings and the making of national epics.
Victoria Street in Nicosia’s Arabahmet neighbourhood is reconstructed through Byzantine, Lusignan, Ottoman, British, and Republic-era changes, including the Armenian Church and later neglect.
Using Lebanon's power-sharing and party politics as context, the chapter follows Armenian church bodies from the French Mandate through regional crises, showing their competing national agendas and cultural role.
The article follows ex-Ottoman Armenian refugees in Soviet Armenia as they attach memory to Ergir across nostalgia, Stalin-era suppression, and a later revival of homeland thinking.
An ethnography of Armenianness in contemporary Turkey compares Christian Armenians, Muslim or Alevi citizens reclaiming ancestry, and migrants from the Republic of Armenia.
Interwar legal and diplomatic writing is used to examine how empathy for Armenian suffering remained embedded in imperial, racial, religious, and civilizational hierarchies despite internationalist claims of shared humanity.
This history describes the Armenian diaspora’s formation in Uzbekistan and its contribution to social and economic change, including ethnic-policy rights and national cultural centres.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record