Slow-Burn Destruction: Reading "Conditions of Life" into Twenty-First Century Genocide
Chakhmakhchyan, Svetah and Meyroyan, Edgar · 2025
Targets a gap in genocide law: the under-use of Article II(c) of the Genocide Convention: 'deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction', against strategies of deprivation that kill a group slowly. Blockades, sieges, and enforced isolation produce attrition that escapes timely legal recognition because the harm unfolds gradually and specific intent is harder to prove, so such acts get downgraded to humanitarian crises or war crimes. The authors clarify the doctrinal scope of Article II(c), synthesize the jurisprudence on actus reus and genocidal intent without a body-count threshold, and turn it into an early-warning and charging framework with objective triggers such as sustained supply shortfalls, health-system collapse, and repeated obstruction of humanitarian access. A proof-of-concept applies the framework to the blockade of the Berdzor Corridor.
Read the publication ↗Citation
Chakhmakhchyan, Svetah and Meyroyan, Edgar 2025. Slow-Burn Destruction: Reading "Conditions of Life" into Twenty-First Century Genocide. International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 102–128 (Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, Yerevan); DOI 10.51442/ijags.0065. https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0065
What this offers a reader
The clearest available answer to 'can a blockade be genocide?': directly usable in a law or human-rights paper.
Peer-reviewed doctrinal and comparative analysis; both authors are AGMI-affiliated researchers.
Builds the legal case that the strangling of Artsakh was not just a humanitarian crisis but genocide by attrition.
Explains how starving a population can legally amount to genocide, even without mass shootings.
Topics
Related in the repository
Citation checked against the publisher's record on .