An Armenian Religious Miscellany Manuscript in Southern California
Cowe, S. Peter · 2004
Argues that, now that most public Armenian manuscript collections are covered by detailed catalogues, scholarship should turn to documenting the many codices still in private libraries and bringing their contents into the public domain. Though such manuscripts tend to be comparatively late, they often preserve material of real importance. Cowe uses the case to reinforce the text-critical principle that a manuscript's own date matters far less than the date of its exemplar in assessing its value as a witness, and to criticise the arbitrariness of imposing upper chronological limits when selecting manuscripts for a critical edition.
Read the publication ↗Citation
Cowe, S. Peter 2004. An Armenian Religious Miscellany Manuscript in Southern California. Revue des Études Arméniennes, Vol. 29 (2003-2004), pp. 49–88 (Peeters); DOI 10.2143/REA.29.0.2002619. https://doi.org/10.2143/REA.29.0.2002619
What this offers a reader
Why a 'late' manuscript in someone's attic can matter more than an old one in a museum.
Methodological argument about manuscript selection in critical editing, illustrated from a diaspora codex.
The manuscripts in our own families' hands are worth cataloguing. Cowe makes the case.
Why Armenian manuscripts held privately in the diaspora deserve serious scholarly attention.
Topics
Related in the repository
Citation checked against the publisher's record on .