Identity Construction in Armenian Music on the Example of the Early Folklore Movement
Davidjants, Brigitta · 2015
Examines how national identity was constructed within the early Armenian folklore movement. Davidjants notes that Armenian identity construction has drawn on Armenia's status as the first Christian state and on a well-integrated Western diaspora, both used to present Armenians as 'European', even though Armenia shares many cultural traits with its neighbours. Against that background she compares two approaches to transcribing Armenian folk tunes: those of Komitas and those of his contemporary, the folklorist Arshak Brutyan. Komitas leaned toward a Western way of thinking, standardising tunes according to the Western music system, while Brutyan sought transcription methods better fitted to Armenian musical culture. It is Komitas's approach that remains dominant in Armenian academic circles today.
Read the publication ↗Citation
Davidjants, Brigitta 2015. Identity Construction in Armenian Music on the Example of the Early Folklore Movement. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, Vol. 62, pp. 175–200 (Estonian Literary Museum); DOI 10.7592/FEJF2015.62.davidjants. https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2015.62.davidjants
What this offers a reader
A rare critical rather than devotional treatment of Komitas, and of what his method left out.
Ethnomusicological analysis; author is of Armenian descent, at the Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre.
Komitas made a choice about how to write our music down, and there was another option. Worth knowing.
The methodological argument Komitas was part of, and the rival nobody remembers.
Topics
Related in the repository
Citation checked against the publisher's record on .