Comparative evidence from Mi'gmaq and Chol favors a numeral-based account of classifiers, while optional classifier use in Western Armenian illustrates within-language variation that competing noun- and numeral-centered theories explain differently.
Özgül examines Turkish court petitions by Muslim citizens of Armenian descent seeking changes to registered names and religions, revealing tensions between conversion, tolerance, and legal identity.
The article compares Armenian Genocide and Jewish Holocaust memory policies by examining why museums and monuments occupy different roles in public remembrance.
Bale and Khanjian analyze how singular and plural marking compete in Western Armenian, with particular attention to definite noun phrases. Their argument uses the language’s restricted singular interpretations to test broader accounts of grammatical complexity.
A linguistic survey of Syria identifies Armenian as one of four Christian non-Arab languages in 2011, together with Western Aramaic, Suret, and Turoyo.
Rather than isolate a national past, the essay places Armenian history within world history through interactions, encounters, and connections that cross conventional political borders.
The article surveys Ottoman relations with Armenian subjects and argues that Armenian theater professionals, including work associated with Bosco and Naum venues, helped introduce and develop opera terminology and practice in the empire.
Horomos's 1038 sixteen-column zhamatun is analyzed as a probable royal mausoleum whose plan helped establish a new Armenian fore-church type copied in later centuries.
The article connects the American Board's educational and medical missions in Van to the area's large Armenian population and the founding of the American Hospital.
Martirosyan, author of the standard etymological dictionary of inherited Armenian vocabulary, assesses where Armenian sits within the Indo-European family, demonstrating especially close relationships with Greek and Indo-Iranian through systematic lexical correspondences. A foundational modern reference on the origins of the Armenian language.
This article studies the wartime transfer of Armenian women and children into Muslim households and postwar efforts to locate, reintegrate, and redistribute survivors. It situates those processes in Istanbul and the changing international setting after World War I.
Twenty-seven indicators across ten prevention fields ranked Armenia with Ukraine and Russia at the bottom of a forty-three-country European health-policy comparison.
Stakeholder focus groups and interviews evaluating a free Nagorno Karabagh physician-education program found stronger professional exchange, knowledge, and confidence, but limited application where hospitals lacked equipment and technology.
Comparable national surveys from twenty countries show roughly thirty-percent hypertension prevalence among Armenians aged 35–49 and especially low diagnosis, treatment, and medication control in Armenia alongside Albania, Iran, and Turkey.
The paper compares placement, form, masonry, and ornament of external niches on medieval Armenian churches, finding an early structural role in simplifying roofs and walls that gradually converged toward façade decoration after the seventh century.
Coverage in Lebanese Armenian newspapers of the 1946 repatriation campaign reveals changing ideas of citizenship, homeland, and belonging as the newly independent country defined itself.
Responses from thirty-five European haemophilia organizations in 2012 showed wide treatment inequality: Armenia reported 0.20 IU of factor VIII per capita versus Sweden's 8.56, while repeat-survey countries improved prophylaxis and home care.
Abramson profiles Lebanese Armenians as both a self-organized diasporic community and a constituent of Lebanese society, emphasizing the institutions built after refugee settlement.
A nationally representative 2001 survey across eight former Soviet states placed Armenian use of folk practitioners at 3.5 percent, versus 25 percent in Kyrgyzstan.
The biography reconstructs Polish-Armenian scholar Stefan Wartanowic Lehacy's education, translations, church service, family background, and possible painting activity during the seventeenth century.
The article explains why United States congressional recognition of the Armenian Genocide remained blocked despite support from states, institutions, associations, and public figures, emphasizing executive deference to Turkey and American strategic interests.
A fragmented essay joins inherited family memories, survivor exile, Australian Gallipoli commemoration, and disputed naming to portray genocide denial as an embodied intergenerational presence.
Examines whether the Republic of Turkey bears legal responsibility for the Armenian Genocide committed by its Ottoman predecessor. Applying the doctrine that state identity and continuity survive changes of government, argues the Kemalist republic is the continuation of the Ottoman state and is responsible for internationally wrongful acts against Armenians. A cornerstone for legal arguments on recognition and reparations, in one of the world's top international law journals.
His earliest published article, written at York University, surveying Armenian migration to and community formation in Ontario across the period spanning the Armenian Genocide, 1887–1930. It anticipates the themes he later developed in Genocide Studies International and in the Georgetown Boys work: Armenian arrival in Canada, community institutions, and the rupture and reconstitution caused by the Genocide.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record