Lebanon's February 1956 Armenian Church election is analyzed as both a community choice and a Cold War contest in which Armenian Lebanese actors used American-Soviet rivalry to advance local interests.
Baar and Baar compare the economic structures and long-term strategies of post-Soviet de facto states after major regional policy shifts in 2014-2016. Nagorno-Artsakh appears alongside Transnistria, South Ossetia-Alania, and Abkhazia in an analysis of dependence and geopolitical constraint.
Population surveys from Nagorno-Karabakh and three other post-Soviet de facto states link trust in external patrons with confidence in presidents, security, economic performance, and postwar order.
The essay traces how Russia's 1917–1918 spelling changes prompted Armenian reforms beginning in 1922, later modified in 1940, without imposing Cyrillic or Latin script.
The article studies Russian efforts to influence Armenians (Ermeniler) and Kurds (Kürtler) before the First World War and relates that policy to the 1913–1914 Bitlis uprising.
The French-loanword study traces when borrowed terms entered Armenian across science, technology, arts, politics, architecture, industry, and agriculture.
Ani serves as a case for comparing Turkish and Armenian national heritage narratives with the everyday meanings assigned by communities living around the medieval site.
Cross-national observation data since 1960 and six country cases, including Armenia, explain why authoritarian-leaning rulers invite monitors who may expose election manipulation.
Ethnographic comparison finds northern Azerbaijani identity articulated against Armenians, whereas Iranian Azerbaijanis coexist with a large Armenian diaspora and orient grievances toward Persian rule.
Interviews with Satenik, a senior lieutenant who led a medical battalion during the Nagorno-Karabakh war, trace her route to the front, encounters with violence, relationships with soldiers, and difficulty returning to restrictive postwar gender roles.
An eight-volume Vatican archival reconstruction is reviewed through correspondence spanning 1894–1925, alongside Jewish advocacy, Genocide denial, and post-Soviet Armenian nationalism.
Ottoman archival directives are used to reconstruct forced conversion and assimilation of Armenian women and children as organized components of the 1915 genocide.
The article synthesizes a research volume linking Armenian history with German, French, and Italian literatures, including genocide aftermath and recognition debates.
The Four-Day War is used to argue that limited international engagement suppresses wider discussion of Nagorno-Karabakh while increasing regional aggression by Armenia and Azerbaijan.
An architectural and symbolic interpretation of Tsitsernakaberd asks how the Soviet-era Yerevan complex carries Armenian Genocide memory and substitutes for destroyed sacred places.
The article places Armenia among the Eurasian Economic Union's five founding-era members and evaluates the bloc as an evolving vehicle for Russian regional hegemony through institutions, material capacity, security, welfare consent, and cultural leadership.
A legal-ethnographic reading of Soghomon Tehlirian's 1921 Berlin trial asks how revenge reasoning shaped the jury's acquittal after he killed Talaat Pasha.
The essay describes rediscovering Armenian memory places in Turkey and Azerbaijan after systematic historical falsification, destruction, and neglect of cultural monuments.
A comparative book treats Nagorno-Karabakh alongside Northern Cyprus, Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Kosovo, and Crimea as unresolved European conflicts structured by ethnic, territorial, cultural, and linguistic boundaries.
This Polish overview follows Armenians (Ormian) through Ludobójstwo in Turcji, Soviet experience in the ZSRR, diaspora communities, and restored independence.
Panos Terlemezian's career from 1885 to 1915 is reconstructed across revolutionary activity, prison, exile, Ottoman repression, genocide, and artistic training to position him within both late Ottoman and modern Armenian painting.
Drawing on community histories, Armenian-language periodicals, and interviews in Lebanon, France, and the United States, the dissertation traces how post-genocide dispersion became a transnational diaspora divided between competing homeland-centered and diaspora-centered institutions.
This Turkish-language overview places the late-Ottoman Armenian issue after Balkan Christian national movements and considers diaspora advocacy, parliamentary recognition, and the possibility of future scholarly reconciliation.
Three restoration cases—Aghtamar’s Holy Cross, Sourp Guiragos in Diyarbakır, and Havav’s fountains—anchor this assessment of Armenian heritage in Turkey. The article places preservation initiatives within changing Kemalist and neo-Ottoman state narratives and maps actors working in Anatolia and Istanbul.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record