Kuzguncuk’s Armenian church and mosque sustain a nostalgic image of Istanbul pluralism, while historic-house restoration and gentrification obscure departed minorities, mid-century Turkification, traumatic exclusion, and newer class divisions.
Aslanian examines how Armenian merchants from New Julfa built trust for long-distance trade through a combination of reputation, collective norms, and semi-formal legal institutions. The article centers the merchants’ Assembly as a practical mechanism for coordinating cooperation in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
The essay presents Armenian-Russian cultural relations as reciprocal rather than simply progressive or colonial, arguing that imperial incorporation mediated European modernity while Armenians actively shaped Russia's cultural and socioeconomic life.
Stewart reconsiders the 1307 assassination of Armenian king Hetum II in relation to Ilkhan conversion, Mongol-Armenian alliances, and changing religious politics.
The study surveys Armenian and neighboring sources for earthquakes and volcanism from the eighth century BCE onward, explaining methods and evaluating the principal historical catalogs.
The essay surveys historians’ disputes over destruction of the Arméniens in the Empire ottoman, separating broad agreement on extermination from controversy about collective state intention and the category of génocide.
Legvold evaluates de Waal's account of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, which follows late Soviet collapse, independence, warfare, and the regional interests surrounding Artsakh.
Shain and Barth place diasporas within international-relations theory as actors shaping homeland foreign policy. Their argument tests the relationship between the newly established Armenian state and its diaspora against a comparative case involving Israel and diaspora Jews.
Djahukian examines lexical correspondences between Armenian and Kartvelian languages, treating borrowings in both directions as evidence for reconstructing their linguistic histories.
A comparative study of tenth-century architect Trdat connects his Hagia Sophia dome repair and Ani Cathedral construction with a little-known Armenian text, revealing building practices and exchange across the Christian East.
Structured as a historical survey, the article follows Armenia's Christianization, early church organization, competing Cappadocian and Syrian orientations, hereditary offices, and ecclesiastical conflict into the medieval era.
A review assesses a two-volume translation and commentary of the seventh-century Armenian History attributed to Sebeos, emphasizing its breadth across Roman, Sasanian, and early Arab transformations.
Lévy reviews Pattie's ethnography of Armenians rebuilding community, evaluating how historical consciousness, institutions, and daily practice sustain diasporic belonging.
Créé au CRH en novembre 1999, ce groupe de recherches d'histoire arménienne organise ses programmes autour de « Monnaies, réseaux, politique » et présente ses premiers résultats collectifs.
Melson reviews Dadrian's interdisciplinary explanation of the Armenian Genocide, assessing how the book connects long-term Ottoman-Armenian conflict, massacres, and wartime destruction.
This analysis studies argumentative strategies used to dispute evidence of the Armenian Genocide in an American political appeal. It identifies recurring rhetorical patterns that recast denial as reasoned inquiry while obscuring responsibility and historical documentation.
The inquiry revisits the 1877–78 Russo-Ottoman war and the St Stephano and Berlin treaty clauses, asking what violence by Kurds and Circassians placed Armenian security on the international agenda.
Vertovec distinguishes diaspora as a social form, consciousness, and cultural production while tracing how dispersed communities maintain ties across states. Its conceptual discussion names Armenians among the historical cases that shaped the category alongside other diasporic populations.
This article compares the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust as reference points for interpreting later mass violence. It argues that the Armenian case can clarify nationalist forms of destruction that do not fit a single universal model.
This article traces institutional and professional mechanisms used to cast doubt on established scholarship concerning the Armenian Genocide. It links documentary evidence with an ethical examination of how authority, funding, and scholarly credibility can be mobilized in denial campaigns.
Cohen reconsiders diaspora through contrasting histories of coercion, migration, and creative affiliation beyond a homeland. The article explicitly treats Armenians as a victim diaspora while comparing how nationalisms and globalisation reframe diasporic loyalties.
Dadrian evaluates a wartime Turkish document translated by British officials as evidence concerning Young Turk decision-making before the destruction of Ottoman Armenians.
The article treats Turkish military tribunal proceedings as documentation for the wartime deportation and massacres of Ottoman Armenians, centering the disputed question of whether state authorities intentionally organized the destruction.
Çalışma, Birinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasındaki Doğu Lejyonu'nu Fransız işgal bölgesi ve Güney Cephesi bağlamına yerleştirerek Ermeni Meselesi, İtilaf politikaları ve 1918'deki tanınma söylemini ilişkilendirir.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record