Kuzguncuk’s Armenian church and mosque sustain a nostalgic image of Istanbul pluralism, while historic-house restoration and gentrification obscure departed minorities, mid-century Turkification, traumatic exclusion, and newer class divisions.
A thirteen-category framework compares state failure in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, finding that Armenia alone retained a territorial monopoly on force while separatist entities undermined the other two states.
Stewart reconsiders the 1307 assassination of Armenian king Hetum II in relation to Ilkhan conversion, Mongol-Armenian alliances, and changing religious politics.
Mueller uses rhetorical theory to examine the withdrawal of a United States House Armenian Genocide resolution and the public defense offered by Speaker Dennis Hastert.
The essay places the Armenian factor within a proposed South Caucasus security architecture, emphasizing Armenia's role in regional democracy and economic progress, diaspora participation in United States politics, and intersecting interests of the United States, European Union, and Russia.
This book places the Armenian Genocide within late Ottoman and Turkish political history and approaches the violence through perpetrator institutions and subsequent state denial.
The essay surveys historians’ disputes over destruction of the Arméniens in the Empire ottoman, separating broad agreement on extermination from controversy about collective state intention and the category of génocide.
Björklund compares Armenian communities in Athens and Istanbul through ethnographic fieldwork, using their different settings to examine transnational nationhood, community boundaries, and identity.
Legvold evaluates de Waal's account of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, which follows late Soviet collapse, independence, warfare, and the regional interests surrounding Artsakh.
Shain and Barth place diasporas within international-relations theory as actors shaping homeland foreign policy. Their argument tests the relationship between the newly established Armenian state and its diaspora against a comparative case involving Israel and diaspora Jews.
This comparative article considers how U.S.-based Armenian and Jewish communities engage, respectively, the Karabakh and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts. It frames diaspora activity as an intermediate arena between domestic politics and interstate diplomacy, identifying questions for research on conflict and peacemaking.
Fieldwork with women-led Yerevan NGOs shows participants shifting between tradition and modernization rhetoric to obtain donor support, navigate officials, and re-enter public life after Soviet quotas ended.
Créé au CRH en novembre 1999, ce groupe de recherches d'histoire arménienne organise ses programmes autour de « Monnaies, réseaux, politique » et présente ses premiers résultats collectifs.
Sanasarian examines relations between Iran's Islamic Republic and non-Muslim minorities, including Armenians, through legal structures, ideology, institutions, and community responses.
Melson reviews Dadrian's interdisciplinary explanation of the Armenian Genocide, assessing how the book connects long-term Ottoman-Armenian conflict, massacres, and wartime destruction.
This analysis studies argumentative strategies used to dispute evidence of the Armenian Genocide in an American political appeal. It identifies recurring rhetorical patterns that recast denial as reasoned inquiry while obscuring responsibility and historical documentation.
The inquiry revisits the 1877–78 Russo-Ottoman war and the St Stephano and Berlin treaty clauses, asking what violence by Kurds and Circassians placed Armenian security on the international agenda.
This article traces institutional and professional mechanisms used to cast doubt on established scholarship concerning the Armenian Genocide. It links documentary evidence with an ethical examination of how authority, funding, and scholarly credibility can be mobilized in denial campaigns.
Sanasarian analyzes how Iran's Armenian diaspora maintained communal institutions under the Islamic Republic from 1979 through 1989 despite strong state dominance.
This modern history traces the social and cultural formation of Armenian nationality through imperial division, dispersion, genocide, Soviet experience, and renewed independent statehood.
Dadrian evaluates a wartime Turkish document translated by British officials as evidence concerning Young Turk decision-making before the destruction of Ottoman Armenians.
The article treats Turkish military tribunal proceedings as documentation for the wartime deportation and massacres of Ottoman Armenians, centering the disputed question of whether state authorities intentionally organized the destruction.
Çalışma, Birinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasındaki Doğu Lejyonu'nu Fransız işgal bölgesi ve Güney Cephesi bağlamına yerleştirerek Ermeni Meselesi, İtilaf politikaları ve 1918'deki tanınma söylemini ilişkilendirir.
This article examines how cultural narratives can shape political violence in diasporic settings without a sovereign state. Its discussion of Armenian diaspora experience situates terrorism within contested histories, state absence, and regional conflict rather than presenting it as an innate communal trait.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record