The article surveys competing definitions of diaspora and applies them to Armenians in the Russian Federation, tracing migration, community formation, political roles, and the Armenian Apostolic Diocese. It treats classical and modern diaspora as overlapping sociological, ethnic, and political formations.
The chapter critiques the European human-rights court's reliance on absent general consensus when reviewing Switzerland's punishment of Doğu Perinçek for genocide denial.
A legal note follows the Armenian Catholicosate's attempt to recover Sis through Turkish courts and the ECHR, comparing property doctrine with an Article 9 religious-freedom claim.
The dissertation traces migration from the Ottoman homeland to the United States and then examines diaspora organizations’ efforts to shape American policy on genocide recognition, aid, and relations with Armenia. Its argument treats lobbying as the mechanism that moved contested historical claims into foreign-policy debate.
The article studies Ottoman official language about the anti-Armenian violence of 1895–1897, emphasizing passive constructions, euphemism, and claims of provocation.
Lebanon's February 1956 Armenian Church election is analyzed as both a community choice and a Cold War contest in which Armenian Lebanese actors used American-Soviet rivalry to advance local interests.
Koinova proposes a sociospatial account of diaspora mobilization in international relations and illustrates it with Armenian genocide-recognition activism and Palestinian statehood activism. The argument attends to networks and contexts beyond the usual home-state and host-state triangle.
Baar and Baar compare the economic structures and long-term strategies of post-Soviet de facto states after major regional policy shifts in 2014-2016. Nagorno-Artsakh appears alongside Transnistria, South Ossetia-Alania, and Abkhazia in an analysis of dependence and geopolitical constraint.
The article traces Armenian migration periods and the development of Armenia-diaspora institutions before examining lobbying, partnership priorities, and church organization in countries of residence.
Population surveys from Nagorno-Karabakh and three other post-Soviet de facto states link trust in external patrons with confidence in presidents, security, economic performance, and postwar order.
The paper surveys Ammianus Marcellinus's accounts of Greater Armenia and examines how the historian used Armenian events to support political judgments.
The essay traces how Russia's 1917–1918 spelling changes prompted Armenian reforms beginning in 1922, later modified in 1940, without imposing Cyrillic or Latin script.
The article studies Russian efforts to influence Armenians (Ermeniler) and Kurds (Kürtler) before the First World War and relates that policy to the 1913–1914 Bitlis uprising.
The French-loanword study traces when borrowed terms entered Armenian across science, technology, arts, politics, architecture, industry, and agriculture.
Drawing on archival material, this book studies British imperial responses to reports of violence against Armenians, early humanitarian mobilization, and attempted prosecution for crimes against humanity.
Ani serves as a case for comparing Turkish and Armenian national heritage narratives with the everyday meanings assigned by communities living around the medieval site.
Adriaans analyzes the Armenia Fund Telethon and its road-building campaign connecting Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, using fieldwork from the 2013 and 2014 broadcasts. The study treats fundraising media and infrastructure as practices through which diaspora households participate in humanitarian governance and de facto state formation.
Cross-national observation data since 1960 and six country cases, including Armenia, explain why authoritarian-leaning rulers invite monitors who may expose election manipulation.
Ethnographic comparison finds northern Azerbaijani identity articulated against Armenians, whereas Iranian Azerbaijanis coexist with a large Armenian diaspora and orient grievances toward Persian rule.
Interviews with Satenik, a senior lieutenant who led a medical battalion during the Nagorno-Karabakh war, trace her route to the front, encounters with violence, relationships with soldiers, and difficulty returning to restrictive postwar gender roles.
An eight-volume Vatican archival reconstruction is reviewed through correspondence spanning 1894–1925, alongside Jewish advocacy, Genocide denial, and post-Soviet Armenian nationalism.
Armenian anti-mining activists are shown translating and resisting neoliberal policy while creating civic practices outside established advocacy channels, despite not changing extraction itself.
Ottoman archival directives are used to reconstruct forced conversion and assimilation of Armenian women and children as organized components of the 1915 genocide.
The study compares Holocaust memory frameworks with official, diasporic, social, and personal practices surrounding remembrance of the 1915 Armenian Genocide.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record