A policy study examines gender representation across nine Armenian high-school textbooks plus standards, syllabi, teacher guides, prior local research, and stakeholder interviews.
Bosnian interviews investigate how genocide denial affects survivors, using intergenerational consequences attributed to Armenian denial as a comparative point of departure.
The study compares Armenian institutional life in Russia and Lebanon, using interviews and existing scholarship to examine factors affecting institution building and identity preservation. It emphasizes host-country conditions, community origins, and ties among organizations.
The article synthesizes a research volume linking Armenian history with German, French, and Italian literatures, including genocide aftermath and recognition debates.
Debates over Israel Ori are used to compare how Ashot Hovhannisyan and Leo connected geopolitical orientation with competing visions of Armenian national identity and society.
Parla and Özgül connect the seizure of Istanbul's Surp Hagop Armenian cemetery to longer histories of property loss, citizenship, and the contested inclusiveness of the Gezi protests.
The Four-Day War is used to argue that limited international engagement suppresses wider discussion of Nagorno-Karabakh while increasing regional aggression by Armenia and Azerbaijan.
An architectural and symbolic interpretation of Tsitsernakaberd asks how the Soviet-era Yerevan complex carries Armenian Genocide memory and substitutes for destroyed sacred places.
Suciyan reconstructs the experiences of Armenians living in twentieth-century Turkey after 1915 from state records, Armenian institutional minutes, periodicals, memoirs, diaries, oral histories, and law. The book centers community-produced archives while examining the continuing effects of denial, modernization, and discriminatory governance.
Using secondary scholarship and media, the article advances an Azerbaijan-centered account of territorial, casualty, and economic-social consequences, with a focus on its Khojaly ethnic-cleansing allegation.
The article places Armenia among the Eurasian Economic Union's five founding-era members and evaluates the bloc as an evolving vehicle for Russian regional hegemony through institutions, material capacity, security, welfare consent, and cultural leadership.
Gürpınar traces how Turkish denial of the Armenian Genocide became institutionalized between the 1970s and 1990s. The article distinguishes left, right, and centrist forms of denial and relates them to state, academic, and security institutions.
A legal-ethnographic reading of Soghomon Tehlirian's 1921 Berlin trial asks how revenge reasoning shaped the jury's acquittal after he killed Talaat Pasha.
The essay describes rediscovering Armenian memory places in Turkey and Azerbaijan after systematic historical falsification, destruction, and neglect of cultural monuments.
A comparative book treats Nagorno-Karabakh alongside Northern Cyprus, Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Kosovo, and Crimea as unresolved European conflicts structured by ethnic, territorial, cultural, and linguistic boundaries.
Suny presents a synthetic history of the destruction of Ottoman Armenians, relating mass deportation and killing to wartime decisions, imperial crisis, and nationalist politics.
The study follows the development of Armenian Genocide denial in American academic settings and analyzes the tactics that portray repudiated claims as legitimate controversy. It emphasizes the institutional pathways through which misleading arguments gain scholarly visibility.
This Polish overview follows Armenians (Ormian) through Ludobójstwo in Turcji, Soviet experience in the ZSRR, diaspora communities, and restored independence.
Panos Terlemezian's career from 1885 to 1915 is reconstructed across revolutionary activity, prison, exile, Ottoman repression, genocide, and artistic training to position him within both late Ottoman and modern Armenian painting.
Drawing on community histories, Armenian-language periodicals, and interviews in Lebanon, France, and the United States, the dissertation traces how post-genocide dispersion became a transnational diaspora divided between competing homeland-centered and diaspora-centered institutions.
Schultz and Harutyunyan compare whistleblowing laws and anti-corruption strategies in the United States, Europe, and Armenia. They treat protected reporting as one tool within broader democratic and institutional reform rather than a self-sufficient solution.
This Turkish-language overview places the late-Ottoman Armenian issue after Balkan Christian national movements and considers diaspora advocacy, parliamentary recognition, and the possibility of future scholarly reconciliation.
Three restoration cases—Aghtamar’s Holy Cross, Sourp Guiragos in Diyarbakır, and Havav’s fountains—anchor this assessment of Armenian heritage in Turkey. The article places preservation initiatives within changing Kemalist and neo-Ottoman state narratives and maps actors working in Anatolia and Istanbul.
Ishkanian examines Armenia's grassroots civic initiatives, their rejection of professionalized nongovernmental organizations, and the alternative models of citizenship they developed after independence.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record