The Research Repository

Armenian scholarship open to all

A digital library of verified, open scholarship on all things Armenian, including Armenian history, the Genocide, Artsakh, language, and the diaspora.

A new one every 3 days

The full repository

Topic:Abgar Dpir
Showing 1 of 1 matching publications (200 total) · catalogue updated 2026-07-22
Journal ArticleOpen Access

The First of Early Modern Armenian Diplomats: Rethinking Abgar Dpir's Contribution to Armenian National History

Ghazaryan, Flora, 2025
Matenadaran: Medieval and Early Modern Armenian Studies (MEMAS), Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 97–115 (Mesrop Mashtots Matenadaran / Brepols); eISSN 3041-5063

Takes up the understudied field of early modern Armenian diplomacy through the neglected case of Abgar Dpir's 1562 delegation to Rome, a turning point that provoked aggressive Vatican intervention and deepened the confessional split between Catholic and Apostolic Armenians. Ghazaryan unpicks the mission's motives, allowing for the divergent aims of the parties involved. She argues that Abgar Dpir was not of royal descent, and that the royal pedigree was manufactured by Etchmiadzin's leadership to fit him into the Western 'society of princes' and give the delegation a hearing. She further contends that his celebrated printing activity functioned as cover for the diplomatic mission.

Abgar DpirArmenian printing historyearly modern diplomacyEtchmiadzinconfessionalisation
EnglishRead The First of Early Modern Armenian Diplomats: Rethinking Abgar Dpir's Contribution to Armenian National History (opens in a new tab)

Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.

Suggest a publication →

How this repository is built

What is in this repository?

Peer-reviewed and institutional scholarship on Armenian subjects — history, the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, language and literature, the church, and the diaspora — in any language and from any country. Journal articles, books, book chapters, theses and institute publications are all in scope. Entries are chosen for what they contribute to an Armenian student's understanding, not for how recent or how famous they are.

What does 'verified' mean here?

It means a person opened the link and checked the record against the publisher's own page: the title, the authors, the venue, the volume and pages, and the identifier. The date of that check is shown on each entry's page. Where an entry has no date shown, no check has been logged for it yet, and the catalogue does not claim one.

What is the summary on each entry?

A short account of what the publication does, followed by notes on what it offers different readers — a student writing a term paper, an academic, someone reading for the community, someone new to the subject. They are meant to tell you what a piece is useful for, not only what it argues.

How do I suggest a publication, or report an error?

Use the 'Suggest a publication' link at the foot of the directory. The same address takes corrections — a broken link, a wrong page range, a misattributed author. Corrections are checked against the publisher's record before an entry changes.