El artículo contrapone memorias nacionalistas e islamistas de Gallipoli, centradas o no en MustafaKemal, y muestra cómo ambas relegan la deportación de los armenios anatolios ordenada en 1915.
The article argues that Armenian Genocide denial operates through a pervasive discourse shared across competing Turkish state and civil-society settings.
Laurinavičiūtė and Biekša set out legal conditions associated with remedial secession and compare them across several post-Soviet conflicts, including Nagorno-Karabakh. The article argues that the doctrine does not justify the independence claims considered and stresses the role of good-faith negotiation.
Turkish denial, collaborative repression, emerging voices for recognition, and diaspora identity frame this study of the Armenian Genocide’s political consequences nearly a century later.
This article analyzes escalation and mediation in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict through direct, structural, and cultural forms of violence. It argues that mediation should account for historical memory and institutional conditions as well as immediate armed incidents.
Survey evidence from elected officials and Armenian organization leaders in Glendale compares perceived leadership styles with acculturation, community commitment, and cultural identity.
Tölölyan and Papazian discuss divergent ideas of nationhood in Armenia and diaspora communities and consider how those differences shape institutions, mobilization, and collective identity.
A comparative review places Rwanda’s genocide-ideology law beside the Holocaust and Armenian Genocide, finding that legal narratives and enforcement vary sharply with each country’s political circumstances.
The article follows interwar efforts to preserve Armenian communal life after genocide and the failure of state-building projects. It uses those efforts to analyze how refugee protection, anti-trafficking work, and international humanitarian practice developed within the League of Nations.
The dissertation argues that Armenian communal reform, especially the 1860/63 National Constitution and Patriarchate centralization, was integral to Ottoman Tanzimat state-building rather than derivative nationalism.
Özgül examines Turkish court petitions by Muslim citizens of Armenian descent seeking changes to registered names and religions, revealing tensions between conversion, tolerance, and legal identity.
A dataset of 448 United States diplomatic cables released through WikiLeaks compares Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh, Somaliland, and Northern Cyprus, testing how support, hostility, isolation, and engagement vary among them.
Kasbarian and Öktem examine friendships among Armenians, Turks, and Kurds in transnational settings to ask whether personal relationships can challenge denial and nationalist mobilization.
A linguistic survey of Syria identifies Armenian as one of four Christian non-Arab languages in 2011, together with Western Aramaic, Suret, and Turoyo.
Between 1903 and 1914, Tsarist policy toward Russian Armenians shifted through church-property confiscation, Dashnaktsutiun repression, bourgeois negotiation, Caucasian unrest, and changing Ottoman strategy.
After the 1915 genocide, the League of Nations shifted the Armenian Question from politics toward humanitarian action through survivor liberation, Nansen passports, settlement in Soviet Armenia, and organized refugee communities in Syria and Lebanon.
The article surveys Ottoman relations with Armenian subjects and argues that Armenian theater professionals, including work associated with Bosco and Naum venues, helped introduce and develop opera terminology and practice in the empire.
Comparing Albanian, Armenian, and Palestinian communities in the United Kingdom, this article examines how diaspora actors pursue sovereignty claims through host-state and transnational channels. Its Armenian case addresses ties to Nagorno-Karabakh.
This study treats the wartime removal and recovery of Armenian children as central to understanding genocide rather than as a marginal aftermath. It connects those experiences to the development of child, minority, and human-rights thinking after the First World War.
Cavoukian studies relations between Armenia's state institutions and Armenian communities in Russia, testing claims that shared Soviet political experience shapes philanthropy and organization.
Twenty-seven indicators across ten prevention fields ranked Armenia with Ukraine and Russia at the bottom of a forty-three-country European health-policy comparison.
Abramson profiles Lebanese Armenians as both a self-organized diasporic community and a constituent of Lebanese society, emphasizing the institutions built after refugee settlement.
The study uses survey evidence to examine how national identification, perceived threat, and attitudes toward war shape acknowledgement of violence against Armenians. It connects these social-psychological factors with support for responsibility and reparative responses.
Anticipating the 2015 centennial, the article frames recognition, responsibility, and reconciliation as mutually dependent responses to the state-orchestrated Armenian massacres and deportations of 1915.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record