The Research Repository

Armenian scholarship open to all

A digital library of verified, open scholarship on all things Armenian, including Armenian history, the Genocide, Artsakh, language, and the diaspora.

A new one every 3 days

The full repository

Topic:Albanisation
Showing 1 of 1 matching publications (200 total) · catalogue updated 2026-07-22
Journal ArticleOpen Access

Azerbaijan's Policy of Forced Cultural Appropriation after the Second Artsakh War: The Case of Dadivank Monastery

Martirosyan, Hayastan A., 2022
International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, Yerevan); DOI 10.51442/ijags.0035

Documents the methods by which Azerbaijani officials have pursued the forced appropriation of Armenian cultural monuments in Artsakh since the 2020 war. The article traces the 'Albanisation' thesis in Azerbaijani SSR historiography from the 1950s onward, showing how it was constructed to make all peoples of the South Caucasus appear equally indigenous. Dadivank, in the Karvachar area, serves as the case study: after passing under Azerbaijani control in November 2020 it was recast internationally as Caucasian Albanian heritage. The author sets out the 'scientific bases' advanced by Soviet and post-Soviet historians and the concrete channels through which the rebranding is promoted to international audiences.

cultural heritage destructionDadivankAlbanisationArtsakhhistorical revisionism
EnglishRead Azerbaijan's Policy of Forced Cultural Appropriation after the Second Artsakh War: The Case of Dadivank Monastery (opens in a new tab)

Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.

Suggest a publication →

How this repository is built

What is in this repository?

Peer-reviewed and institutional scholarship on Armenian subjects — history, the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, language and literature, the church, and the diaspora — in any language and from any country. Journal articles, books, book chapters, theses and institute publications are all in scope. Entries are chosen for what they contribute to an Armenian student's understanding, not for how recent or how famous they are.

What does 'verified' mean here?

It means a person opened the link and checked the record against the publisher's own page: the title, the authors, the venue, the volume and pages, and the identifier. The date of that check is shown on each entry's page. Where an entry has no date shown, no check has been logged for it yet, and the catalogue does not claim one.

What is the summary on each entry?

A short account of what the publication does, followed by notes on what it offers different readers — a student writing a term paper, an academic, someone reading for the community, someone new to the subject. They are meant to tell you what a piece is useful for, not only what it argues.

How do I suggest a publication, or report an error?

Use the 'Suggest a publication' link at the foot of the directory. The same address takes corrections — a broken link, a wrong page range, a misattributed author. Corrections are checked against the publisher's record before an entry changes.