The Research Repository

Armenian scholarship open to all

A digital library of verified, open scholarship on all things Armenian, including Armenian history, the Genocide, Artsakh, language, and the diaspora.

A new one every 3 days

The full repository

Topic:Kartvelian
Showing 1 of 1 matching publications (200 total) · catalogue updated 2026-07-22
Journal ArticleOpen Access

A New Look at Old Armenisms in Kartvelian

Thorsø, Rasmus, 2022
Armeniaca. International Journal of Armenian Studies, Vol. 1 (2022), pp. 97–110; DOI 10.30687/arm/9372-8175/2022/01/006 (Edizioni Ca' Foscari, Venice)

Treats the most ancient layer of Armenian loanwords in the Kartvelian languages. Because Kartvelian historical phonology is relatively conservative compared with Armenian, these borrowings occasionally preserve more archaic forms, recoverable by the comparative method. Thorsø re-examines six previously proposed Armenian loans (including the words for 'ford', 'stream', 'wine', 'juniper', 'kidney' and 'mushroom') and advances one new proposal. He argues this stratum of loans probably dates to the latter half of the second millennium BC, before the breakup of Proto-Georgian-Zan, which would push the first identifiable Armenian-Kartvelian contacts back to that period.

Armenian historical linguisticsIndo-EuropeanKartvelianlanguage contactloanwords
EnglishRead A New Look at Old Armenisms in Kartvelian (opens in a new tab)

Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.

Suggest a publication →

How this repository is built

What is in this repository?

Peer-reviewed and institutional scholarship on Armenian subjects — history, the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, language and literature, the church, and the diaspora — in any language and from any country. Journal articles, books, book chapters, theses and institute publications are all in scope. Entries are chosen for what they contribute to an Armenian student's understanding, not for how recent or how famous they are.

What does 'verified' mean here?

It means a person opened the link and checked the record against the publisher's own page: the title, the authors, the venue, the volume and pages, and the identifier. The date of that check is shown on each entry's page. Where an entry has no date shown, no check has been logged for it yet, and the catalogue does not claim one.

What is the summary on each entry?

A short account of what the publication does, followed by notes on what it offers different readers — a student writing a term paper, an academic, someone reading for the community, someone new to the subject. They are meant to tell you what a piece is useful for, not only what it argues.

How do I suggest a publication, or report an error?

Use the 'Suggest a publication' link at the foot of the directory. The same address takes corrections — a broken link, a wrong page range, a misattributed author. Corrections are checked against the publisher's record before an entry changes.