Following Syrian Armenians after 2011, the study maps multidirectional movement among refuge, transit, return, and settlement, then shows how the 2020 Artsakh war deepened precarity in Armenia.
Letters exchanged by Tarkovsky and Armenian filmmaker Bagrat Hovhannisyan reveal mentorship, conflict, and pragmatic support as a younger director navigated Soviet cinema’s cultural and political establishment.
Three episodes in Bishop Mkrtič Nałaš's Diyarbakır career reveal Armenian clerical patronage and agency intertwined with the formation of the Aqquyunlu state during the fifteenth century.
Wilbrand’s Cilician embassy narrative records Epiphany processions, clergy, discantus, chants, and ceremonial sound while situating Lesser Armenia among diplomatic, military, and ecclesiastical networks.
Paired Armenian colophons and Arabic chronicles illuminate raids, reciprocal violence, and disputed place names during Lewon IV’s Cilician reign between Mamluk and Ilkhanate powers.
Ottoman leaders’ threat perceptions, Russian intervention, Armenian political parties, territorial fears, and imperial decline are presented as interacting drivers of genocidal decision-making.
The article argues that the 2020 war transformed the South Caucasus from a Russia-centered security subregion into a bipolar arena shared by Russia and Turkey.
A comparison of two patron–client crises studies how Artsakh’s relationship with Armenia changed after the 2020 war alongside the case of Republika Srpska and Serbia.
Interviews with patients from Artsakh and oncology professionals in Armenia identify how war, territorial change, and corridor restrictions disrupted access to diagnosis and cancer treatment.
Comparing media around Nagorno-Karabakh and Cameroon, this education article proposes classroom methods for analyzing propaganda, othering, citizen reporting, social platforms, and uneven news attention.
Reading the Rome Statute beside heritage treaties, the author argues that damage to Artsakh monuments and suppression of cultural practice evidence coercive displacement.
The article compares sources and documents to argue when the Azerbaijan-Artsakh conflict began, what political circumstances produced it, and how Artsakh's status was represented at the conflict's origin.
This scoping review compares the post-1991 development of healthcare systems in Armenia and eight other former Soviet states across maternal, mental, infectious, and chronic health domains.
Archival materials, interviews, and memoirs support an account of three ideological currents in Soviet Armenian dissent, including independence, human rights, genocide remembrance, and Karabakh reunification.
This social-policy study follows Azerbaijan’s internally displaced population from the first Karabakh war through post-2020 return programs, assessing benefits, integration, and varied vulnerabilities.
Reviewing the 2020 war and aftermath, the paper analyzes Russian mediation, the failed peacekeeping mission, Turkish-Iranian competition, and Western diplomacy across the South Caucasus.
Survey research compares student and faculty awareness of sustainable-development goals at universities in Armenia, Georgia, Central Asia, and the European Union.
Because the Battle of Satala cannot be reconstructed directly, the authors compare Armenian narratives and Galerius's reliefs to identify Alexander-romance topoi and deliberate imperial propaganda.
A historical and legal reading presents Aghven's assembly under King Vachagan II and its canonical constitution as an early expression of Armenian constitutional procedure.
Geographical and policy analysis groups Russia's interests in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia into military-political, territorial, social, and economic categories using its 2023 foreign-policy concept.
Latvia's 2021 Armenian Genocide recognition resolution becomes a case for constructivist memory politics, showing how varied actors change an event's public salience or meaning while building support for memory law.
A pragma-stylistic analysis of Politico coverage examines euphemistic replacement in reporting on the Artsakh humanitarian crisis and assesses how mitigation can imply meaning while maintaining an appearance of neutrality.
Examining Syria, Libya, and Nagorno-Karabakh after 2015, the article characterizes Russia-Turkey relations as simultaneous tactical alliance and strategic competition, arguing that the Ukraine invasion preserved rather than displaced this pattern.
Combining statistics, surveys, and interviews, this article identifies why Russian citizens relocated to Armenia after the invasion of Ukraine and what encouraged or discouraged longer residence.
Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.
Suggest or correct a record