The Research Repository

Armenian scholarship open to all

A digital library of verified, open scholarship on all things Armenian, including Armenian history, the Genocide, Artsakh, language, and the diaspora.

A new one every 3 days

The full repository

Topic:Septuagint
Showing 3 of 3 matching publications (200 total) · catalogue updated 2026-07-22
Journal ArticleOpen Access

A New, Critical Edition of Armenian Deuteronomy, Forty Years after its 'Diplomatic' Predecessor: Reflections and the Results of New Collations

Cox, Claude, 2024
Matenadaran: Medieval and Early Modern Armenian Studies (MEMAS), Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 35–51 (Mesrop Mashtots Matenadaran / Brepols); ISSN 3041-5063

Reflects on producing a fully critical, eclectic edition of the classical Armenian translation of Deuteronomy, replacing an earlier diplomatic edition after forty years. Discusses the textual-criticism value of the Armenian version as a secondary witness to the Old Greek/Septuagint, the difficulty a non-Greek version poses for reconstructing its source text, and the methodology and rewards of collating manuscripts. Published by the Matenadaran, Armenia's institute of ancient manuscripts.

classical Armenian BibleDeuteronomySeptuaginttextual criticismmanuscript collation
EnglishRead A New, Critical Edition of Armenian Deuteronomy, Forty Years after its 'Diplomatic' Predecessor: Reflections and the Results of New Collations (opens in a new tab)
BookPaywalled

The Armenian Version of Daniel

Cowe, S. Peter, 1992
Peeters / Scholars Press; University of Pennsylvania Armenian Texts and Studies 9; XVIII+490 pp.; ISBN 9781555406875

Cowe's 490-page critical study and edition of the Armenian version of the Book of Daniel, in the University of Pennsylvania Armenian Texts and Studies series. He cites it himself in his New Cambridge History of the Bible chapter, and it underpins his 2014 Brill chapter on the reception of Daniel in Armenian society.

Armenian BibleBook of Danielcritical editiontranslation techniqueSeptuagint
EnglishRead The Armenian Version of Daniel (opens in a new tab)
Journal ArticlePaywalled

The Two Armenian Versions of Chronicles: Their Origin and Translation Technique

Cowe, S. Peter, 1991
Revue des Études Arméniennes, Vol. 22 (1990-1991), pp. 53–96 (Peeters); DOI 10.2143/REA.22.0.2017165

A 44-page study of the two distinct Armenian versions of the biblical Books of Chronicles, examining their origin and their translation technique: a core problem in the textual history of the Armenian Bible. Cowe cites the article himself in his New Cambridge History of the Bible chapter, confirming its standing in the field.

Armenian BibleBooks of Chroniclestranslation techniquebiblical textual criticismSeptuagint
EnglishRead The Two Armenian Versions of Chronicles: Their Origin and Translation Technique (opens in a new tab)

Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.

Suggest a publication →

How this repository is built

What is in this repository?

Peer-reviewed and institutional scholarship on Armenian subjects — history, the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, language and literature, the church, and the diaspora — in any language and from any country. Journal articles, books, book chapters, theses and institute publications are all in scope. Entries are chosen for what they contribute to an Armenian student's understanding, not for how recent or how famous they are.

What does 'verified' mean here?

It means a person opened the link and checked the record against the publisher's own page: the title, the authors, the venue, the volume and pages, and the identifier. The date of that check is shown on each entry's page. Where an entry has no date shown, no check has been logged for it yet, and the catalogue does not claim one.

What is the summary on each entry?

A short account of what the publication does, followed by notes on what it offers different readers — a student writing a term paper, an academic, someone reading for the community, someone new to the subject. They are meant to tell you what a piece is useful for, not only what it argues.

How do I suggest a publication, or report an error?

Use the 'Suggest a publication' link at the foot of the directory. The same address takes corrections — a broken link, a wrong page range, a misattributed author. Corrections are checked against the publisher's record before an entry changes.