ARF Shant Student Association logoARF ShantStudent Association
The Research Repository

Armenian scholarship open to all

A digital library of verified, open scholarship on all things Armenian, including Armenian history, the Genocide, Artsakh, language, and the diaspora.

A new one every 3 days

What is being done to Armenian monuments in Artsakh now is not new and it is not vandalism. Seda Parsamyan traces the demolition policy of the Hamidian massacres of the 1890s and puts the legal question directly: when a state sets out to erase a people's churches, at what point does that become cultural genocide? She works through how the concept has been defined, redefined and quietly narrowed by people who would rather it did not apply. The frame she builds is the one now being reached for over Artsakh.

Mass Destruction of Armenian Cultural Heritage during the Hamidian Massacres (1894-1896)

Parsamyan, Seda A. · 2023 · International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 5–34 (AGMI, Yerevan); DOI 10.51442/ijags.0043
Read itOpen Access

The full repository

Topic:Sultanate of Rum
Showing 1 of 1 matching publications (200 total) · catalogue updated 2026-07-22
Journal ArticlePaywalled

La première incursion des Mamelouks en Cilicie: D'ʿAyn Djālūt jusqu'à Mari (1260–1266) (The First Mamluk Incursion into Cilicia: From ʿAyn Jalut to Mari)

Ter-Ghevondian, Vahan, 2025
Revue des Études Arméniennes, Vol. 43 (2025), pp. 411–426 (Peeters); DOI 10.2143/REA.43.0.3295032

Covers the six years separating two famous battles, ʿAyn Jalut (1260) and Mari (1266). Armenian, Arab and Syriac historians all report the first Mamluk invasion of Cilicia and the events preceding it, but Ter-Ghevondian examines angles that have not received sufficient attention: the internal conflicts within Cilicia, the role of the Sultanate of Iconium, and the importance of Egyptian espionage, the factors that favoured Mamluk success and Armenian failure. Where ʿAyn Jalut opened a half-century of Mamluk-Mongol struggle over Greater Syria, Mari was the prelude to the long series of incursions that ended in the fall of the last Armenian kingdom. The analysis rests on Grigor of Akner, Smbat Sparapet, Kirakos of Gandzak, Bar Hebraeus and Arabic chroniclers.

Cilician ArmeniaMamluksMongolsmedieval military historyArmenian chroniclers
French

Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.

Suggest a publication →

How this repository is built

What is in this repository?

Peer-reviewed and institutional scholarship on Armenian subjects — history, the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, language and literature, the church, and the diaspora — in any language and from any country. Journal articles, books, book chapters, theses and institute publications are all in scope. Entries are chosen for what they contribute to an Armenian student's understanding, not for how recent or how famous they are.

What does 'verified' mean here?

It means a person opened the link and checked the record against the publisher's own page: the title, the authors, the venue, the volume and pages, and the identifier. The date of that check is shown on each entry's page. Where an entry has no date shown, no check has been logged for it yet, and the catalogue does not claim one.

What is the summary on each entry?

A short account of what the publication does, followed by notes on what it offers different readers — a student writing a term paper, an academic, someone reading for the community, someone new to the subject. They are meant to tell you what a piece is useful for, not only what it argues.

How do I suggest a publication, or report an error?

Use the 'Suggest a publication' link at the foot of the directory. The same address takes corrections — a broken link, a wrong page range, a misattributed author. Corrections are checked against the publisher's record before an entry changes.