ARF Shant Student Association logoARF ShantStudent Association
The Research Repository

Armenian scholarship open to all

A digital library of verified, open scholarship on all things Armenian, including Armenian history, the Genocide, Artsakh, language, and the diaspora.

A new one every 3 days

What is being done to Armenian monuments in Artsakh now is not new and it is not vandalism. Seda Parsamyan traces the demolition policy of the Hamidian massacres of the 1890s and puts the legal question directly: when a state sets out to erase a people's churches, at what point does that become cultural genocide? She works through how the concept has been defined, redefined and quietly narrowed by people who would rather it did not apply. The frame she builds is the one now being reached for over Artsakh.

Mass Destruction of Armenian Cultural Heritage during the Hamidian Massacres (1894-1896)

Parsamyan, Seda A. · 2023 · International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 5–34 (AGMI, Yerevan); DOI 10.51442/ijags.0043
Read itOpen Access

The full repository

Topic:commemoration
Showing 2 of 2 matching publications (200 total) · catalogue updated 2026-07-22
Journal ArticlePaywalled

The Talat-Tehlirian Complex: Contentious Narratives of Martyrdom and Revenge in Post-Conflict Societies

Yenen, Alp, 2022
Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 394–421 (Cambridge University Press); DOI 10.1017/S0010417522000019

Examines the assassination of Talat Pasha by Soghomon Tehlirian in Berlin on 15 March 1921, and Tehlirian's trial and acquittal that June, as the origin of conflicting legacies of the Armenian Genocide. Yenen argues that although small in terms of violence and legal consequence, these events and their reimagination in contentious narratives have become a dominant prism for sense-making in Turkish-Armenian relations. In rival national imaginations, Talat and Tehlirian each compete for the same categories of hero and victim while being demonized as villains by the other side. The article follows the assassination, the funeral, the trial, the long silence, and the later commemorative cycles.

Operation NemesisTehlirian trialTalat Pashamartyrdom and revengeTurkish-Armenian relations
English
ThesisOpen Access

Survivors: An Ethnographic Study of Armenian American Activism and Expression

King, Melissa Ruth, 2013
PhD dissertation, Anthropology, University of California, Riverside; eScholarship

In Armenian American youth activism, the practice of memory of woundedness and genocide is conceived as a form of resistance tied to claiming a subjectivity as diasporan Armenians and as a US minority. Young activists position themselves in history as remnants and freedom fighters, demanding recognition of the Genocide in a struggle for justice that simultaneously demands their own recognition as survivors in a context of perceived denial. The activist tradition studied here tends toward anti-assimilationism and the display of woundedness as a means of obtaining perceptibility. Youth claim survivorship through diasporan institutions that structure commemorations, cultural events and political protests. The study rests on eighteen months of field research in the Los Angeles region.

genocide recognitiondiaspora activismArmenian Americanscommemorationgenocide denial
English

Know published research that belongs here, or have scholarly work of your own? Suggest it and we'll review it for the repository.

Suggest a publication →

How this repository is built

What is in this repository?

Peer-reviewed and institutional scholarship on Armenian subjects — history, the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh, language and literature, the church, and the diaspora — in any language and from any country. Journal articles, books, book chapters, theses and institute publications are all in scope. Entries are chosen for what they contribute to an Armenian student's understanding, not for how recent or how famous they are.

What does 'verified' mean here?

It means a person opened the link and checked the record against the publisher's own page: the title, the authors, the venue, the volume and pages, and the identifier. The date of that check is shown on each entry's page. Where an entry has no date shown, no check has been logged for it yet, and the catalogue does not claim one.

What is the summary on each entry?

A short account of what the publication does, followed by notes on what it offers different readers — a student writing a term paper, an academic, someone reading for the community, someone new to the subject. They are meant to tell you what a piece is useful for, not only what it argues.

How do I suggest a publication, or report an error?

Use the 'Suggest a publication' link at the foot of the directory. The same address takes corrections — a broken link, a wrong page range, a misattributed author. Corrections are checked against the publisher's record before an entry changes.